PaperSummary - The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production - How great is the impact?
About Paper
- Citation info는 다음과 같습니다.
Ellegaard, Ole, and Johan A. Wallin. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?." Scientometrics 105.3 (2015): 1809-1831.Abstract 초월 번역
- Bibliometric Method(or Analysis)는 research 평가 방법론(research evaluation methodology)를 위한 필수적인 구성 요소로서 인정받고 있다. 특히 해당 분석 방법은 다양한 과학 분야에서 연구기관(institution)들과 대학교들이 어떻게 중요하게 해당 학문에 공헌하고 있는지를 평가하기 위해서 많이 사용되고 있다.
- 본 논문에서는 Web-of-Science 에 포함된 bibliometric literature에 대해서 어떤 분석 방법들이 사용되었는지를 분류하였고, 이를 통해 크게 2가지 분류로 분석되어있음을 알 수 있었다.
- 이 분야의 충분한 양의 문헌들이 이미 수행되었으며, 이를 통해, 우리는 bibliometric method들이 어떤 종류로 사용되었는지를 크게 두가지 분야로 분류할 수 있다.
A sufficient number of studies have been completed, and with the resulting literature, it is now possible to analyse the bibliometric method by using its own methodology. The bibliometric literature in this study, which was extracted from Web of Science, is divided into two parts using a method comparable to the method of Jonkers et al. (Characteristics of bibliometrics articles in library and information sciences (LIS) and other journals, pp. 449–551, 2012: The publications either lie within the Information and Library Science (ILS) category or within the non-ILS category which includes more applied, “subject” based studies. The impact in the different groupings is judged by means of citation analysis using normalized data and an almost linear increase can be observed from 1994 onwards in the non-ILS category. The implication for the dissemination and use of the bibliometric methods in the different contexts is discussed. A keyword analysis identifies the most popular subjects covered by bibliometric analysis, and multidisciplinary articles are shown to have the highest impact. A noticeable shift is observed in those countries which contribute to the pool of bibliometric analysis, as well as a self-perpetuating effect in giving and taking references.